Monday, March 26, 2007
The Cucumber

I'm naming this pud The Cucumber, and not just because of the high likelihood that he bats for the home team. Okay yes, I'm naming him that for exactly that reason.
Staring at torn fishnets and a choke collar dude sandwiched between two sexy if bizarrely eyebrowed hotties, as I've been doing all afternoon, brings up an important point.
I've been debating for awhile whether the Gaybag actually officially qualifies as a sub-genre category douchebag. Certainly Gaybags can appear douchebaggy. Just take The Cucumber here. But I've meditated and ruminated on the topic, and I'm ready to make a decision.
I'm going to rule that Gaybags can not be an official sub-category of Douchebag.
Part of the intrinsic modus operandi of the douchebag is the affectations of douchebaggery in the interests of attracting a hottie. Gaybags may take on douchebag charm through dress, style and forehead grease, but since they're inherently harmless in the presence of the female, they can never ascend to the true personification of douchitude that is the various categories of scrote we chronicle on this site on a daily basis.
Now I'm sure there are gay douchebags in the gay universe. But I will leave that exploration to another website, perhaps Hot Douchebags with Douchebags. For the purposes of our critical exploration of the cultural ramifications of the douche virus, Gaybags are officially ruled out from qualifying for actual Douchebaggery within the confines of the HCwDB universe.
This, however, does not mean we can't marvel at the wrongness of this pic. Only that the soul sucking gut punch wrongness of a true HCwDB pic can never really take place unless the central driving thrust of the 'bag is his intense desire to impress the hottie, and willingness to douche out to do so. Thoughts?
Comments:
<< Home
That right hottie has a certain Elizabeth Berkely, Showgirls FEEL about her.I'd like to save her bell. Be gone Gaybag, I think I saw Slater in the corner.
I thought this site was for pics of douchebags with hot chicks? I'm seeing nothing of the latter here.
I gotta disagree - he's still a bag whether or not he is a fag (I'm a poet and didn't know it - OH!!!). Uhm at any rate, I say this because of one simple reason - he may be gay but he is still sandwiched between those 2 hotties and I'm not, and that makes him a douche in my book.
Don Juan de la Douche
Don Juan de la Douche
Not at all diggin' the two females? in this picture. I think that the 10 pounds of makeup that they are wearing a piece make them look very drag queenesque.
I too have grappled with this dilemna. On a number of occasions though, I have called Gaybags douches, but you bring up a very good point. They pose no threat, so the jealous rage that sometimes embodies our voices on these comments threads is simply not present when it comes to the Gaybags. However, I feel that there still is something to be said about the fact that, gay or not, hotties still seem to hang around pricks who dress in traditional douche garb and act like their shit is odorless. Thus, I am torn between these two schools of thought and do not know if I am ready yet to agree that Gaybags are to be ruled out completely. Very thought-provoking post.
Siegfried & Roy - Not douchey.
Stage 2 'Bag at Tunnel in one of Siegfried and/or Roy's outfits with a tasty morsel in a 'baglock - Scrotum
"Do not lay down with a douche as with a woman, nor spread your douche seed to Malech, for this is abomination."
-Leviticus 4, verse 12
Stage 2 'Bag at Tunnel in one of Siegfried and/or Roy's outfits with a tasty morsel in a 'baglock - Scrotum
"Do not lay down with a douche as with a woman, nor spread your douche seed to Malech, for this is abomination."
-Leviticus 4, verse 12
well, judging from his spiked collar and off-the-hook chain, this picture answers the eternal question "who let the dogs out?". evidently two bleethed-out drag queens.
I do agree that the gaybag doesn't personify the douchitude of the other bags you have showcased on your site and that it should be left to another site but I have to disagree with you ruling out the gaybag sub-category all together. Although they do appear to be "inherently harmless" in nature, rest assured that they still have the douche-force to attract the hotties leaving us empty handed which is perfectly exemplified with cuc and these two lovely eyelash princesses.
If all metrosexuals are douchebags,
and some metrosexuals are douchefags, can it be said that all douchefags are douchebags? I say unequivically yes.
and some metrosexuals are douchefags, can it be said that all douchefags are douchebags? I say unequivically yes.
Wearing a studded collar with a chain and a fishnet shirt makes you look gay? Crap. I'm going to have to change my entire wardrobe.
these chicks have so much makeup they're almost as creepy as gaybag here. not that i wouldn't do them, but y'know...
Post a Comment
<< Home







